Allegheny County's Executive and District Attorney have advanced competing economic and community development proposals in the
wake of UPMC's
uncharitable (but exquisitely profitable and competitively ingenious) abandonment of Braddock.
Dan Onorato's
UPMC-friendly proposal seems natural -- even predictable -- in fo
rm and substance; in form because economic and community development is an important part of the county executive's job description, in substance because
Onorato is Jeff Romoff's faithful government affairs coordinator. (The Post-Gazette -- ignoring or, more likely, forgetting -- the tissue separating Onorato from UPMC in public, actually
refers to Onorato's proposal as "the hospital plan.")
Steve Zappala's
proposal (and
participation) is more difficult to decipher, for at least two reasons. Fir
st, why would a district attorney
conduct a press conference addressing a specific economic and community development project? Second, on whose behalf is Mr. Zappala advocating?
The district attorney's job is to enforce criminal laws. Regardless of how
depraved one considers UPMC's treatment of Braddock, no one has responsibly alleged a crime. Zappala's role in the Braddock debate consequently is inexplicable, even if there were not
myriad situations within
Zappala's jurisdiction that have
deserved (but not, apparently, received) the attention of a prosecutor. (In fairness, the district attorney
conspicuously cleared one prominent case -- oops, sorry, that one must have slipped out of the 'none of his busi
ness, even if it was his brother' folder). (That's brother Greg, right)
That point shades into the second perplexing part of Zappala's involvement: On whose behalf is he proposing a project?
Cynics might wonder whether he is
pushing a real estate deal or a
public contract or perhaps a
government license for one relative or another. The skeptical might speculate that his
family members are undisclosed, but highly paid, mouthpieces for an interested entity. The jaded might wonder whether he could be attempting to
divert attention from
other circumstances, or competing for camera time in preparation for a
statewide political campaign down the road.
The next time a district attorney calls for cameras concerning an economic development proposal for Braddock, or any other community, perhaps at least one reporter will consider asking why the county's chief law enforcement official is devoting time and energy during business hours to something other than investigating and prosecuting crimes.