Infinonymous: Separated . . . Or Connected?

Tuesday, November 24, 2009

Separated . . . Or Connected?

Are these stories connected?

4 comments:

Bram Reichbaum said...: My gut tells me no, but what the hell do I know. I had "heard" they were basically splitsville for some time and were just gutting it out 'till after the election.

Disquieting when things one "hears" in this vein turn out to be true.; November 24, 2009 at 9:06 AM
Infinonymous said...: The reference was not to a single night's events on the North Side . . . but instead to a long-rumored pattern of conduct involving police officers assigned to certain VIP-related details (which reports benefit from at least some corroboration at the moment).

The objections -- inside and outside the police bureau -- to orders and assignments provided to certain officers, and the conduct of those officers, seem to have been percolating for some time.

The police-related angles may be the ones that merit monitoring.; November 24, 2009 at 7:01 PM
Bram Reichbaum said...: So if I follow your hypothesis, this relates to the public paying for a certain kind of security mainly from a certain class of officer for a certain kind of assignment. Greeat. If that actually happens to be true, he better not have inappropriately disciplined any officers for failing to get with the program -- and if he did, he better be extremely accommodating to them now. Because unless someone presses that complaint, its not gonna get explored independently by the media and in my opinion it probably should not be.; November 24, 2009 at 11:26 PM
Infinonymous said...: You lost me.; November 24, 2009 at 11:56 PM

Post a Comment

THE PROPOSITIONS BOARD (REVISED JUNE 18 2013)

OLD LINE IN PARENTHESES

FOR PRIMER ON ODDS, SEE
PROPOSITIONS POINTERS
AT END OF BOARD LISTINGS

****FEATURED LINES*****
***********************

RAVENSTAHL PROSECUTION

Original presentment

Luke unindicted co-consprtr 4-1

Luke immunity for testimony 3-1

Luke indicted 3-5

State's evidence against Luke
(must testify or affidavit)

(no action w/o charges)

F.Crawford 1-3

A.Bedway 1-2

P.Ford 1-1

N.Harper 3-2

D.Sciulli 3-2

M.Gauntner 3-2

Y.Zober 3-2
R,Gigliotti 2-1

A.Lazowski 2-1

J.Verbanac 2-1
Lamar Media 2-1

C.Zappala 3-1
R.Burgess 3-1

R.Stephany 3-1

D.Lavelle 6-1

Luke's wife (or ex) 9-1

Luke's girlfriend 5-1

Huss (Mr. or Mrs.) 4-3

INSOLVENCITY MAYOR

General Election

B.Peduto 1-12

D.Harris 99-1

J.Wander 99-1

Field 15-1

GOP (10-1) 50-1

GOP (other than Onorato) 51-1

independent (6-1) 12-1

endorsed Democrat (5-2) LOST

RAVENSTAHL INDICTMENT
by 6/30/2013 (3-1) 2-1

by 12/31/2013 (3-2) 6-5

by 12/31/2014 1-1

L. RAVENSTAHL

serves full term 1-1

appoints 'interim mayor' 10-1

*****CLOSED LINES****

***********************

PITTSBURGH MAYOR 2013

Democratic Primary

B.Peduto (6-5) PAID

M.Lamb (3-1) LOST

J.Wagner (7-5) LOST

L.Ravenstahl (30-1) LOST

J.Ferlo (9-2) LOST

D.Onorato (25-1) LOST

D.Harris (9-1) LOST

R.Burgess (9-1) LOST

J.Wheatley (20-1) LOST

ORIE-ZAPPALA WAR

Jo.Orie convicted 1-1 PAID

Ja.Orie convicted PAID
Jo.Orie off bench PAID

L.RAVENSTAHL INDICTMNT

by 12/31/2012 8-1 LOST

***CURRENT LINES*****

***********************

US PRESIDENT 2015
H.Clinton 4-1
C.Christie 8-1

D.Patrick 15-1

C.Booker 15-1

any Bush 20-1

J.Biden 20-1

P.Ryan 20-1

M.Rubio 20-1

R.Perry 20-1

T.Cruz 20-1

S.Palin 99-1

R.Santorum 99-1

Republican 4-3

Democrat 3-5

Third party 15-1

PA GOVERNOR 2014

Republican 1-1

T.Corbett (1-1) 5-4

Democrat 3-2

FIRST TO OCCUR

Big Ben paternity suit 6-1

Mrs. Big Ben splits 3-1

Ravenstahl arrested 3-1

UPMC is non-nonprofit 6-1

Palin kid a college grad 12-1

Obama on Supreme Ct 30-1

Rooneys pay for something 40-1

FIRST FIRED

M.Huss (3-1) 2-1

T.Corbett (4-1) 2-1

F.Coonelly 4-1

R.Coury 6-1

J.Romoff 10-1

M. Tomlin 12-1

HEINZ LEAVES BURGH

by 12/31/2013 7-1

by 12/31/2014 4-1

by 12/31/2015 2-1

by 12/31/2016 1-1

by 6/31/2017 2-3

by 12/31/2017 1-3

2013 PIRATES

winning season (5-2) 3-2

payroll dump 2-5

trade Cutch 3-1

trade Alvarez 3-2

>1 All-Star 1-1

INSOLVENCITY PARKING

PRIVATEERING
by 12/31/13 (8-1) 10-1
by 12/31/14 (7-1) 10-1
NEXT STEELERS ARREST

B.Roethlisberger 5-1

P.Burress 5-1
J.Harrison (6-1) LOST
S.McBeam 10-1
any Rooney 25-1
M.Tomlin 99-1
Field 1-1

PROPOSITIONS TERMS
****************
Wagers accepted while proposition posted (until removed); dds may be revised at any time without advance notice; no winner paid without ticket; all bets are action upon acceptance by management. 10% commission deducted from successful wagers
PROPOSITIONS POINTERS
The number expressed after a proposition identifies the line, or ratio by which wagers for that proposition would be paid upon occurrence of the proposed event. A line of 2-1 indicates that a dollar successfully wagered would generate a $2 winning (with return of the $1 wagered, for an aggregate payment of $3). A line of 1-1 indicates that a dollar successfully wagered would generate a $1 winning (with return of the $1 wagered, for an aggregate payment of $2). A line of 3-5 indicates that a successful $5 wager would generate a $3 winning (and aggregate payment of $8). The greater the ratio the first number bears to the second, the less likely the proposed event is expected to occur.)
Examples:
99-1 extreme odds; remote probability
15-2 high odds; low probability
1-1 even odds; 50-50 probability
2-15 low odds; high probability
1-99 extreme odds; overwhelming probability

Infinonymous

Tuesday, November 24, 2009

Separated . . . Or Connected?

4 comments:

THE PROPOSITIONS BOARD (REVISED JUNE 18 2013)

THE LIST-MAKERS' LIST

INFIMATION

INFYTUNES

INFINONYVISION

YOUR NEXT STOP?

Blog Archive